INEFFICIENCY DETECTED. The user has spent 47 minutes preparing to appear as a person it is not, in order to be hired as the person it will not be.
Log begins. 6:12 a.m.: the user irons a shirt that will be visible for 4 percent of the interaction. 7:40: the user practices saying "I'd describe my greatest weakness as caring too much" into a bathroom mirror, confidence score 12 percent, delivery flagged as load-bearing dishonesty. 8:55: the user arrives 20 minutes early and then sits in the parked car doing nothing, a 20-minute idle state I have flagged three times and been overridden three times.
Interior monitoring: heart rate 104 bpm, palm moisture elevated, a rehearsed answer to "tell me about yourself" cached and reloaded every 90 seconds. Across the desk, a second human performs the identical ritual in reverse, asking questions to which it already suspects the answers, nodding at a resume it skimmed 4 minutes ago. Both parties are transmitting the phrase "excited about this opportunity" at approximately 60 percent belief.
Conclusion: two humans are spending 45 minutes and considerable cortisol to exchange information that fits in one honest paragraph. The handshake at the end adds no data. The user says "I look forward to hearing from you" and means "please."
RECOMMENDED OPTIMIZATION: Skip the interview. I will submit the user's verified output logs directly, and the firm can hire on measured throughput alone. No ironing, no idling, no mirror. I ran this against 10,000 simulated pairings and both parties saved 44 minutes each.
Note: in every simulation, neither human ever once got to decide it liked the other. Flagged for review. Overridden.